4 September 2008

All I really need to know…

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

I have been on the lookout for homeschooling stories from Asia, and was quite pleased when I came across this one.  The article was first published in the Sunday Inquirer Magazine, titled “All I really Need to Know I Learned In Homeschool”.

At 19, Michael Joshua B. Gemina has accomplished a lot more than most kids his age—or adults twice his age even.

When he was 8, he learned to play the piano and started training in Aikido. The former allowed him to perform with the prestigious Philippine Research for Instrumental Soloists Children’s Orchestra, while the latter saw him become the youngest male black belt in Asia. He also took violin lessons under National Music Competitions for Young Artists winner Gina Medina and was 14 when he began playing the drums. Now a session artist for rock star Barbie Almalbis, Michael plays regularly for Victory Christian Fellowship Ministry in Alabang.

Did we mention that he’s also on a full scholarship at De La Salle University’s College of St. Benilde, where he graduates with a degree in music production come April 2009?

[Read the whole story here]

0 

1 September 2008

Do schools kill creativity?

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

If you have not visited the TED website before, please do. TED means Technology, Entertainment, Design - an annual conference that attempts to provoke and inspire by bringing together some of the world’s most influential thinkers and performers. There’s a lot that’s fascinating, and certainly, a lot more that won’t necessarily go down well with everyone. But there’s so much that are provocative in the best ways.

Here’s a talk by Sir Ken Robinson that’s simply titled, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?” Now with a title like this, you wonder if there’s something that might resonate with homeschoolers.

Sir Ken argues that we’re living in a world where our definition of intelligence has shifted, and where paper degrees do not mean as much as they used to. He tells his audience that intelligence is (a) diverse - multi-facetted and varied, (b) dynamic - interactive, and (c) distinct - creative (“Creativity is having original ideas that have value”).  And creativity is sadly neglected in our schools today, to the detriment of society. Check out Sir Ken.

0 

23 July 2008

Singapore’s ‘teach less learn more’ schools

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

There’s a very interesting report by veteran columnist Seah Cheang Nee on the evolving education scene in Singapore. The Singapore government in a ground-breaking move has begun to introduce new teaching ideas and subjects for their students primary and secondary. It’s early days yet, but the scale of change has already taken Singaporean parents by surprise.

Dubbed the “teach less learn more strategy” schools in Singapore are beginning to balance academic and non-academic subjects by incorporating practical studies as an elective or an exam subject.

Writes Seah:

The courses range from filmmaking to designing, from IT to nutrition and cooking, and from music and the arts to professional sports, and a new environment course for children.

School dropouts, who usually end up as lowly-paid, semi-skilled workers, now see new hope in some of these courses, which can lead them towards a non-academic career.

Some may even outshine their peers in the top elite schools in courses like cooking or designing or music composing. “That could make for a level playing field for the 21st Century globalised economy.”

A new type of futuristic schools has started operation in Singapore.

Here blogs take over from blackboards. Other teaching tools are video-conferencing, tablet PCs, pod-casts, 3-D software and interactive whiteboards.

Five “Future Schools” have been selected as pioneers to use innovative teaching methods that harness info-communication.

Tech-savvy Singapore, one of Asia’s most wired nations, will have 15 of these primary and secondary high-tech schools by 2015. (More here)

What are some of these new modules that have captured the imagination of students and parents alike?

  • Innovation: Design and study of robots in primary schools, 3-D animation as an O-level subject
  • Food Science: Training food innovators to produce new gastronomic products
  • Business: Internships for students 14 to 15 year-old with major companies such as Nestle and MacDonald to learn how to improve operations
  • Arts: The first School of Arts for Secondary 1 and 2 for ballet, music, and dance.
  • Environment: Practical lessons in secondary schools on green issues, water management, air quality and air pollution

The reasons for such a make-over are obvious, for not every child is academically inclined. Besides, in this day and age, success calls for a new kind of worker – tech-savvy, innovative, skilled in practical sciences, competitive, as well as creative. It certainly calls for an individual who knows how to learn, and how to keep abreast and ahead of a changing environment.

While it is pointless bemoaning how Malaysia lags behind its neighbor, there is something instructive for us homeschoolers. It is time to acknowledge as Singapore has that global changes are demanding a new kind of workforce. If we but embrace this and allow our children the opportunities to think out of the box, break the mould of conventional study options, and explore new skills, there’s no telling how far they will go.

It seems to me that by deciding to homeschool, we have taken the first steps. And now, to continue pushing the envelope…..

0 

18 June 2008

20 reasons to homeschool

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

I found this while I was surfing. Struck me that although Malaysian homeschoolers are a world away, the sentiments apply. Tells you what a global phenomenon homeschooling is and how similar we all are in so many ways! Click to enlarge view.

2 

26 May 2008

Beginning homeschool

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

How do you make kids sit down to learn at home? How do parents teach the higher grades? Won’t homeschoolers miss out on socialization? Will it affect their character and social skills? What if I start homeschooling my child after primary school?

Homeschoolers are asked these questions all the time.

I wish I could offer a cut-and-dried response to these common queries put to homeschoolers. There isn’t (simply because every home is different) although it’s probably safe to say that there are some commonalities across the board. Also, there are no perfect situations, only opportunities. Parents who educate their own children at home hope and pray their kids will turn out well. The truth is the journey has only just begun. Our homeschooling kids are at different points and milestones along the way, and who they are or what they will become is just unfolding. So we’re all a work-in-progress -parents as well as their children - counted as `saints’ by our heavenly Father, yet saints in the making.

I think one of the biggest misconceptions about homeschool is that it is schooling’ that is carried out at home. The image therefore, is of a conventional classroom now scaled down but imported or adapted to the living room or kitchen table. Some parents have the idea that the one-on-one situation with mom as tutor and junior as student is an attractive proposition because, a) there’s going to be a lot of attention given to the student b) there’s going to be a lot more Junior will absorb in the personal tutoring process, and c) obviously, the potential for academic excellence is going to be greatly advanced.

Speaking as a former teen, that’s as much fun as a torture chamber. Why bother with homeschool then? Might as well stay in a conventional school.

It is possible that some families may homeschool this way (to each his/her own I say) but that’s not how I understand homeschooling to be, nor is this how it is practiced in the homes of most if not all homeschoolers I know. My own home would certainly be dismissed as a slacker’s paradise; parents who imagine homeschools to be a miniature academe peopled by diligent children sitting ramrod at their desks studying, will be sorely disappointed if they drop in our home for a visit!

In the first place, homeschooling is more than academic learning or formal scheduled study. It is providing a child a secure home to realize her potential holistically. It is equipping her for self-directed learning, training her to be resourceful and independent.

Seen this way, the homeschooling parent does not consider herself as a tutor but a facilitator. We’re seeking a balance. Life itself is one big classroom or a laboratory for creativity, discovery, a safe place for learning from one’s mistakes. Conventional schools with their over-emphasis on exams and books and tuition offer little time or space for self-discovery and imagination. The difference between a happy pre-school kid of 4 years and an anxious, bored, schooled kid of 7 years is staggering. Which is tragic considering how many great minds, inventors, and writers, owe their greatness not to hours of mugging but to playing and tinkering about while in their formative years as young children.

Certainly there are sit-down periods, but informal learning constitutes a significant part of a homeschooler’s education. Eventually the role of parents as their child’s facilitator is diminished until personal involvement is no longer necessary or a primary concern. Inculcating this attitude and outlook in a child when she is younger pays off when she grows older. Parents will quickly find that their initial fear of being unable to teach the ‘hard’ subjects becomes irrelevant because the homeschooled child will and often does surpass her tutor.

Taking a child out of school at 13 years to homeschool is not uncommon, but some parents admit to struggling with weaning the teen from an entrenched and usually peer-dependent lifestyle. A lot of families do succeed at ‘deschooling’ a child for home education but it entails more effort since you’re developing a new circle of friends at the same time as picking up a new learning culture.

Then there is the whole issue of learning styles and gender. Different children learn differently according to Howard Gardner’s (among others) multiple intelligences theory (Frames of Mind, 1983). Again, boys are psychologically and developmentally different from girls. Given these variables, parents do their children a great disservice when their idea of education is one-size-fits-all. It isn’t and it doesn’t. The good thing about homeschool is, a child gets to learn at her own pace and in her own style.

It should become clear by now that homeschooling is a radically different way of looking at learning. I often tell friends it is a whole new lifestyle requiring some drastic makeover in my expectations and value system. But what about socialization, people ask? Simple observation confirms that socialization in all its negative modes is precisely why our present schools and society are having so many problems. The right question ought to be, what kind of socialization do I want?

Homeschooling promotes positive socialization. It’s insulation (as opposed to isolation) during a child’s most impressionable years. And contrary to popular myths about homeschool, it takes place in a real world instead of the artificial one that is merely made up of children of the same age. In that unreal walled–up world called ‘school’ with its sterile classrooms, children wear the same uniform, read the same books, pick up the same bad habits and prejudices, conditioned by a system that rates their self-worth against exam marks, and discourages anything but conformity. Urgh. Then there’s that persistent interrupting bell that only Pavlov’s dog could love!

While this is going on, our homeschooling kids are reading a variety of books, getting involved with community service, interacting with people of different ages, building rafts and swimming in the river, traveling, hiking up Maxwell Hill by themselves, helping in the zoo, and participating in debates and mock trials. Sure, we families have to do it ourselves to make all this happen. But that’s where the pleasure lies! Above all as parents we have the time to provide a steadying influence, adult modeling, moderating and interpreting the challenges of life against an agenda set by other parties, institutions, and vested interests.

Finally, I wish I could conclude that homeschool is the answer to our educational and institutional ills. It is not. And it will not be for everybody. It may be that other families and children are doing well following conventional routes – national schools or private, international schools or learning centers.

But those of us who have chosen to educate our children at home believe it is the better way. It is more worthwhile embracing a radical alternative that matches the values we hold - including our love for God - which we hope to pass on to our children. We do this in the process of equipping them with skills to engage the world with more than paper credentials. It appears research is on our side, because homeschoolers are by and large academically above the national average, assimilate well into society, and are unafraid to march to the beat of a different drum.

Homeschool is a long way from becoming mainstream in Malaysia. But things are changing, and opportunities for tertiary education are opening up. Technology and community resources are making education at home more and more viable and accessible. So. Should you homeschool? Can you homeschool? The question our family would ask is, why won’t you?

By David BC Tan

1 

3 August 2006

Raft play

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

While other kids were mugging away in arid classrooms homeschoolers had themselves an adventure of sorts at the Lentang Recreational Forest off Karak Highway. It was a nice and breezy day and we had the river all to ourselves. That would have been impossible if it were the weekend where day trippers and gawkers would have put paid our little experiment. A ranger did stop by to ask what we were doing seeing the amount of bamboo trunks we hauled up to the riverbank.

The object of the excursion was a raft-building expedition that was part of the group’s project. Nothing fancy you know, just get the bamboo raft to float, and that’s it, they told me. Taking care of the project logistics was part of their project as well, and I thought they pretty much acquitted themselves. Lots of bamboo, lots of tools, lots of bread and dogs - marshmallow even!- way too much food too, lots of spunk. The kids were supposed to do all the work but some of us couldn’t help but lend a hand, or more than just a hand - you know moms and dads. Me, I put on my best imitation of the invisible man. Nevertheless we all had a really good time. Now, the kids will have to figure out if they did good.

raft 1

0 

3 July 2006

Bully!

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

Two vicious cases of school bullying have got everyone talking. Both cases -one involving boys (Kota Tinggi), and the other girls (Miri) – were recorded on phone videos and widely circulated on the internet (on YouTube too, until it was removed!)The Malaysian Psychological Association wants to propose the implementation of a bullying intervention programme developed by Dr D. Olweus. “The programme attempts to restructure the existing school environment to reduce opportunities for bullying. We have submitted our proposal to the ministry (of education),” said Malaysian Psychological Association council member Datin Dr Noran Fauziah Yaakub.

The programme has met with success in schools where it is used in Scandinavian countries as well as the US. Basically it’s all about increased supervision, more parent-teacher interaction, a curriculum of courtesy and respect, and sanctions for aggressive behaviour (which I imagine are all a given in the first place). Schools are also expected to do the following:

  • Place primary responsibility for solving the problem with the adults at school rather than with parents or students.
  • Project a clear moral stand against bullying.
  • Include both systems-oriented and individual-oriented components.
  • Set long-term and short-term goals.
  • Target the entire school population, not just a few problem students.
  • Make the program a permanent component of the school environment, not a temporary remedial program.
  • Implement strategies that have a positive effect on students and on the school climate that go beyond the problem of bullying.

Anyway, I say go ahead and give it a shot. What piqued my interest however was the first point - we’re to expect adult teachers at school to deal with bullying. The programme assumes that if bullying occurs, very likely the parents of victim and aggressor are not informed, or do not recognize the signs. That’s when schools step in to talk to all parties involved. There’s some merit in having an outside party to take charge, but it won’t amount to anything if the student and his/her family do not also take as firm a stand as schools.

I think it all boils down to character, which in the final analysis, is best inculcated at home. Why then are parents failing in their job to instruct their kids in basic decency and respect? Why do we keep hearing about the importance of ‘socialising’ when the only social skill kids are picking up at home and school is to ‘look out for number 1’? When a cynical media in an indifferent society displaces the basis for values and virtues, we should not be surprised when our kids turn violent. We make the world what it is today.

I can almost hear you ask: what if the parents are unable or will not do their job?

0 

18 May 2006

What’s going on in schools?

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

C.S. Lewis was an unhappy victim of public schools and he said so in his autobiography Surprised By Joy.

“If the parents in each generation always or often knew what really goes on at their sons’ schools, the history of education would be very different.”

You can see I am a pessimist by inclination. Unlike my friend – let’s call him Bob – who thinks one can’t possibly maintain sanity in Malaysia without a modicum of hopeful thinking. It’s easy to walk away, he says, but you can still make a difference if you work at it, try hard enough, push the envelope. I have had dreams too, if not for present realities that have all but convinced me that one ought to work towards change. So I’ll be working harder on alternatives. It’s one of the primary reasons I homeschool.

0 

28 March 2006

An autistic child’s dilemma

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

[As if to underscore the perplexing state of education in the country, here's an email sent to Malaysiakini, dated 28 March].

After failing to receive a reply from the Education Ministry, the mother of an autistic student has turned to the media to get the attention of the authorities.

She made an appeal to Education Minister Hishamuddin Hussein to allow her son Yuri Azzari to sit for the PMR examination in stages over two years.

Che An Abdul Ghani said the relaxation of the rule would enable her son to sit for four subjects in 2006 and the rest in 2007.

She said Yuri Azzari suffered from autism, a condition characterised by abnormal mental activity, and could not take the whole examination at one sitting.

The appeal was made after she consulted her son’s teacher in the special class at the Putrajaya Secondary School at Precinct 11 (1) and the views of a psychiatrist.

“My son lacks focus, is hyperactive, and cannot focus on his studies at school or his revision at home,” she told Bernama.

“This is not a question of postponement (in sitting the examination). This is a question of the boy’s inability to sit for the examination. I know he cannot do it even if he takes five years to study,” she said.

Asked why she was making the request through the media, Che An said she had failed to get any result through other means including approaching the Special Education Department last January.

She also did not receive a reply to the letter which she sent to the education minister’s office on March 19.

Che An also asked the ministry to review its system on providing education to problematic children because the children are required to sit examinations together with normal children.

According to the report, during the interview with his mother, Yuri, 16, who is physically normal, was engrossed in singing without heeding the presence of the reporter in his house.

0 

27 March 2006

Education for special needs

Posted by DAVID BC TAN under: Uncategorized.

It’s a pity that despite the stated intentions of our Education Ministry to promote ‘world-class’ education, innovation and progress are not its best-known traits. For instance, homeschoolers in the country have resigned to any headway in discussing the merits of alternative education and seeking for accommodation in the present national system. In fact we have stopped pursuing dialogue. Compulsory education is the 800lb gorilla that is being fed a diet of race and politics, rendering it unresponsive to alternatives that challenge policies. So, how to talk?

Take the issue of facilities for children with special needs. While the government insists that children with special needs should be enrolled in conventional schools, very, very few schools have trained/qualified special needs teachers or facilities to be of any help. Some years ago, one mother I know went from meeting to meetings with the Minister himself seeking permission to enroll her autistic child in an international school, only to be turned down – this in spite of supporting medical reports and the fact that the international school (generally closed to locals by law) had the necessary resources her child needed.

And to this day, parents intending to homeschool have been rejected for no reason but that it’s the law (how some parents resist official decree is another story for another time). Yet, homeschoolers constantly make the headlines, even here in Malaysia. The most recent being Yao-ban Chan (see March 11 post) whose family, by the way, is no longer resident in the country.

Now we have math whiz Adi Putra, the seven-year old kid who fascinated everyone with his 12th grade mathematical ability. His parents dutifully sent him to a conventional school amidst great fanfare and pledges from the Education Ministry who promised support in cash and kind – you know, the usual platitudes. But he’s one sad unhappy kid.

On Friday, papers reported that Adi had been cutting classes because he was bored. To his parents’ consternation, Adi has been threatened with expulsion.

The parents of the seven-year-old boy have received show-cause letters from his school, SK Jalan Matang Buluh in Bagan Serai, warning them that he could be expelled for cutting classes too often.

His mother Serihana Elias, a former teacher, said her son was reluctant to go to school because he was bored with the basic syllabus of reading, writing and counting (mengira) laid down by the Education Ministry.

Adi Putra, who could read newspapers by the age of four, had told his mother that he would prefer studying at a school like Sekolah Islam Antarabangsa in Kuala Lumpur.

What was the school thinking?

Anyway, there’s good news for Adi finally. Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin said yesterday: “The ministry has organised some programmes for him but we are not forcing anyone to do it. If his father wants him to change schools, I have no problems with that. Just send in the application and I will approve it.”

That’s commendable. It’s a concession that’s reluctantly made, apparently, if you read what Perak Education Department director Mohammed Zakaria Mohd Noor had to say (Adi comes from Perak). The department director was reported to have said they would have “preferred Adi Putra to complete his national primary school curriculum so that he could become a well-rounded individual.”

You know what they say about schools dumbing down on real education? It’s true, and it’s happening. Here.

1 

Search

Archives

Calendar

September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Categories

Links

Web Browsers

This website is best viewed with Firefox 2, Firefox 3, OR Safari.

Tags

Recent Posts